It appears that as we in the Northwest enjoy our usual
interminable stretch of cool, damp weather, the rest of the US is being frozen
solid and buried under a massive blanket of snow. In a serendipitously timely
post, John Reasinger of Cafleurebon just wrote a review of Fleurs de Glace, a
perfume that I was in the process of discontinuing. His description of it is so eloquent and
evocative that it makes me have second thoughts about pulling it from my line!
It also made me think about the symbiotic relationship
between perfumers and reviewers. It’s fascinating to see how a talented writer
can make us see our creations in a new light, and perfume reviewers are
especially adept at doing that. Perfume is like poetry. Everyone gets something
a little different from it, and every interpretation is right. A good reviewer
shows the perfumer aspects of their creation that they had not thought of and
translates the perfumer’s intangible work into tangible words for the public to
enjoy.
This may sound strange, but it reminds me of what happens in
the relationship between a playwright and a director. Having been on both sides
of the process and caught in the middle as an actor, I’ve always marveled at
the transformations that invariably occur depending on the interpretation of
the director and cast. Even though the words written in the script don’t
change, their intent and message inexorably evolves on its own unique
trajectory as rehearsals progress. Each production is a completely different
entity that picks up on different aspects of what the writer intentionally or
unintentionally put in the script. Sometimes the writer is surprised to find
that what they thought was a fluffy comedy actually makes some profound
statements, or what they thought was a serious philosophical and conceptual
piece actually comes across as uproariously funny.
I hadn’t thought of this before, but perfume reviewers
really do interpret the perfumer’s “script” for an audience, with many audience
members doubling as actors, extending the interpretation with their informal
reviews and comments. No one should ever underestimate the importance of
perfume writers at every level in making our creations come to life. There can
never be too many writers because each brings something unique to the process
of understanding a perfume.
Writing this makes me realize how thankful I am to everyone
who writes about perfume, whether they are professional journalists and
bloggers or consumers who post informal reviews and comments. I learn something
from each one of you, and that is the more valuable than I can express.
I’d like to end this by pointing out that there’s a drawing on Cafleurebon for a full-sized bottle of the reader’s choice of Olympic Amber
or Fleurs de Glace for readers in the US.
[All photos are mine. Snow and ice photos are from the last time we had a significant snowfall in Seattle. I don't remember what year it was.]
This post and the little bit of frost on the grass this morning reminded me to wear Fleurs de Glace today!
ReplyDeleteRegarding discontinued fragrances: Salamanca is one of my favorites. Did you discontinue it because it was intended to be a limited edition?
Gail, I discontinued Salamanca because I couldn't find a mitti of sufficient quality from a supplier who was reasonable to deal with. I am planning to reformulate and reissue it at some point because it has a small but strong fan base.
ReplyDelete