A few weeks ago I went onto one of the forums to look
something up and just happened to see a discussion of perfume color. It seems
that many people don’t like “dark yellow” perfumes, but do like light pink,
blue, and lavender tinted juice, and perfumes in pastel tinted glass or dark tinted
bottles.
What this says to me is that the mass-market manufacturers
have deliberately or inadvertently created a consumer preference for the
appearance of perfumes that are very dilute and mostly synthetic, possibly
tinted with a small amount of artificial coloring agent to make them take on
the desired blue, lavender, or pink pastel tone. That’s what ‘s easiest and
cheapest to make, so it makes sense that the mass-market consumer should be
conditioned to prefer those characteristics.
The reality is that many natural materials have that
disliked “dark yellow” color, ranging from dark brown through red and green,
through light yellow, and everything in between, so the corollary of the general
public’s preference for color is a preference for perfumes that are very dilute
and/or contain a low percentage of natural materials.
In addition to preferring certain colors, consumers
apparently like for their perfumes to be color-coded in some semiotic way. Examples
are blue or turquoise for aquatics, pink for sweet, fruity, or candy-like
fragrances, green for green or herbal scents, silver or white for white florals
– you get the picture. It’s not entirely clear whether this applies to the
juice itself, or to the packaging, but it’s probably both. A light green
perfume in a light green box would be expected to have leafy, grassy, herbal,
or otherwise “green” notes like “green apple”. Some packaging makes it
painfully obvious what to expect. People would be shocked if the green apple
were to contain a smoky, animalic oriental.
Other color associations are not so literal, like black for
dark, mysterious, and sexy, or red for exciting and sexy. Of course, this would
mostly apply to the packaging, not the perfume itself, but it’s the same idea.
The issue of color in perfume hit home especially strongly
this week as I make my first production batch of Salamanca for re-release. Two
of the materials that I use in it, hay absolute and vetiver co-distilled with
mitti, were more on the brown side when I made the original formula, but the
new batches of both are more on the green end of the spectrum. It is possible
that these will fade to brown after the concentrate is diluted, but I suspect
that Salamanca will be greenish this time around. Actually, it may look
prettier than the old version, although green may lead people to expect green
grass rather than sun-dried vegetation.
My guess is that the average mass-market consumer expects
the color of a fragrance to remain consistent from batch to batch, and would be
disconcerted to find that their favorite pink EdT has changed to light brown or
lavender. However, the color of natural materials can be highly variable from
batch to batch, even though the odor profile remains fairly consistent.
Probably most people who are savvy about natural perfumery know that color can
vary, so are not disturbed by variations any more than they would be by
variations in the shape and color of organic carrots that they buy in the
produce market. In fact, Michael was delighted to find carrots that ranged from
near-white to beet-red and bluish-purple at our local Trader Joe’s. I’m happy
to report that they all taste like carrots.
[All images adapted from Wikimedia except for Golden Cattleya, which is mine. It's interesting that when I did a Google search for "dark yellow perfume image", the old 15-ml bottle of Golden Cattleya was at the top of the results.]
Those black/purple carrots seem kind of creepy to me and the white and yellow ones remind me of turnips - not one of my favorite vegetables. Color does influence my vegetable purchases but seems to have nothing to do with why a buy a fragrance. I have to admit, though, that pastel colored juices make me think "celebuscents", Lady Gaga notwithstanding.
ReplyDeleteOne name, bottle color and packaging comes to mind when I think of promotional misfires: M. Micallef Black (Black Ananda). What is that tame and wearable white floral doing in the black bottle with the crystals and the alembic shaped top? Maybe the black, opaque bottle is disguising some scary colored liquid? I didn't buy this fragrance for the black bottle, though. I just happened to like the friendly white floral inside and happened to find it at a really low price.
oops...parsnips, not turnips!
DeleteYou're right that the white carrots look like parsnips. I'll probably do another post on color and how that influences our expectation of smell and taste. It's kind of scary how much effect it has.
DeleteI think a major function of opaque bottles is to hide ugly liquid. Maybe not scary-colored, but cloudy or otherwise unappealing looking.
I understand that I am an exception, but I like brown, viscous appearing fragrances because I associate this with natural oils, like myrrh, that take on these characteristics as they deliciously age. My heart beats a little faster when I see a bottle of Youth Dew that you cannot see thru anymore, it has darkened with age and is all the better for it......
ReplyDelete